Only time for a short one. But then I'm always terse and laconic in my taciturn way.
I
first discovered the world wide web in 1995. Prior to that, my use of
the internet had been primarily for email to the university faculty I
worked with or logging into AOL, which was a graphical experience, but
highly proprietary.
But then I got my new laptop with OS/2
Warp installed. Warp had an excellent browser installed that predated
Internet Explorer and was a sibling to the Netscape browser with
identical lineage back to the Mosaic browser developed by the University
of Illinois. It was called the IBM WebExplorer and debuted in 1994 with
OS/2 Warp (v3), it was hailed as the best browser by Internet Magazine in their November issue and leveraged its position as the only native browser in OS/2 at that time.
It
was based on the Mosaic web browser and was referenced in "The HTML
Sourcebook: The Complete Guide to HTML," a very important early resource
for web developers. Almost immediately after the introduction of OS/2
Warp version 3, IBM dismantled the development team and that relegated
the WebExplorer to the annals of history. Another dumb IBM move. Seems
like they never really "got it."
IBM WebExplorer, at that
time, was the browser application to beat. OS/2 Warp 4, released in
1996, included it, but also included a link to download an OS/2 version
of Netscape Navigator 2.02, which was too late to ship on the OS CD.
IBM had already planned the substitution of WebExplorer. Surprised by
the success of WebExplorer, IBM reformed the development team, but I
think it did not have the spark of the original developers. Netscape
caught the traction, and later the notice of Microsoft, leading to the
"browser wars" of the late nineties, initially won by MS, but now -- not
so certain -- as IE market share drops despite MS rediscovery of its
importance. Maybe they let the IE team go too. They've acted a lot more
like IBM in recent times.
The intellectual root of both
WebExplorer and Netscape, Mosaic, is the web browser most often credited
with popularizing the World Wide Web. It was also a client for earlier
protocols such as FTP, NNTP, and gopher associated with the University
of Wisconsin. Mosaic's clean, easily understood user interface,
reliability, Windows port and simple installation all contributed to
making it the application that opened up the Web to the general public.
Mosaic was also the first browser to display images inline with text
instead of displaying images in a separate window. While often described
as the first graphical web browser, Mosaic was preceded by the
lesser-known Erwise and ViolaWWW.
Mosaic was developed at
the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) at the
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign beginning in late 1992. NCSA
released the browser in 1993, and officially discontinued development
and support on January 7, 1997. However, it can still be downloaded from
NCSA.
Fifteen years after Mosaic's introduction, the most
popular contemporary browsers, Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, and
Google Chrome, retain many of the characteristics of the original Mosaic
graphical user interface (GUI) and interactive experience.
Netscape
Navigator was later developed by James H. Clark and many of the
original Mosaic authors; however, it intentionally shared no code with
Mosaic. Netscape Navigator's code descendant is Mozilla.
Of
course, the secret to surfing the web was and is search engines. In
those days we all used AltaVista and what a magic tool it seemed. It
appeared that all of man's knowledge was laid out there in the Internet
just waiting for the exploring mind to discover.
On one of
my trips to San Jose, I recall visiting AltaVista’s offices in Palo
Alto, Calif., in 1995. I was impressed to see that the then-popular
search engine had indexed 16 million Web pages on a set of machines that
were the size of two large Coke machines. You could actually wrap your
arms around the Web.
My how it has changed. Now I use the
Internet every day to buy and sell and check on bills and statements and
financial dealings. I even use it for publishing these "notes." So much
as changed in the fifteen years I've been watching. How much more will
it change in the next fifteen?
See, terse ... laconic ... breviloquent ... succinct. What more could you ask for?
(In
the interest of brevity, I held back on all my opinions about OS/2 and
Windows 95 and the great opportunity that IBM passed by with all the
sharing of technology and experience with Microsoft on OS/2 joint
develpment allowing the Redmond giant to take the IBM family jewels and
include them in their own competitive products that were a better match
for the hardware of that time, but not as forward thinking as the OS/2
architecture and interface. Further, by including a Windows
compatibility mode in OS/2, IBM eliminated any compelling reason to
develop applications specifically for OS/2, almost assuring it's
disappearance when IBM just lost the stomach for competing with Windows.
-- Opps, better stop now while I'm ahead, or short, or brief, or
laconic.)
Originally written on April 25, 2011.
Sunday, September 16, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment