We’ve all heard the cell phone carriers trumpet 4G. The latest
is the pretty girl in the poka-dot dress giving a hard time to a
decidedly Apple influenced pair of individuals, a smart looking young
man, reminiscent of “I’m a Mac,” and a bald headed guy reminiscent of
“I’m a PC.” (Please ignore all snide comments that yours truly closely
resembles the latter. In my head, I’m the young guy :-D )
We’ve
heard that the latest iPhone is really “only” 3G. And what about the
move of the iPhone to Verizon? Will it be as fast as the iPhone on
AT&T, or an Android? What about all those new phones shown at
Comdex? What does this all mean? Most people know that the G stands for
the generation of cellular wireless standards. But what can 4G do that
3G could not?
3G and 4G are standards for mobile
telecommunications. Standards specify how the airwaves must be used for
transmitting information (voice and data). 3G (or 3rd Generation) was
launched in Japan in 2001. As recently as mid-2010, the networks for
most wireless carriers in the U.S. were 3G. 3G networks were a
significant improvement over 2G networks, offering higher speeds for
data transfer. The AT&T “EDGE” network, that your iPhone sometimes
resorts to, is a 2G network.
Both 2G and 3G networks were
designed primarily for voice communications rather than data. On the
other hand, 4G is designed especially for data transmission rather than
voice. So 4G offers faster access to data using mobile phones. For
example, streaming video works better with 4G, with less stuttering and a
higher resolution. Similarly, video conferencing and multi-player
online games work better with the faster data transmission offered by
4G.
Speed requirements for 4G service set the peak
download speed at 100 Mbit/s for high mobility communication (such as
from trains and cars) and 1 Gbit/s for low mobility communication (such
as pedestrians and stationary users). Considering that my home network
is a 1Gbit/s Ethernet, the idea that my cell phone network will match my
home, wired network is amazing. Pardon me while I drool.
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU), formerly known as the CCIR — Comité consultatif international pour la radio,
"Consultative Committee on International Radio" or "International Radio
Consultative Committee" — was founded in 1927. The ITU
Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R) is one of the three sectors (divisions
or units) of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and is
responsible for radio communication. Its role is to manage the
international radio-frequency spectrum and satellite orbit resources and
to develop standards for radiocommunications systems with the objective
of ensuring the effective use of the spectrum.
Pre-4G
technologies such as mobile WiMAX and first-release 3G Long Term
Evolution (LTE) have been on the market since 2006 and 2009
respectively, and are often branded as 4G. The current versions of these
technologies did not fulfill the original ITU-R requirements of data
rates approximately up to 1 Gbit/s for 4G systems. Yet, marketing
materials use 4G as a description for Mobile-WiMAX and LTE in their
current forms.
IMT-Advanced compliant versions of the
above two standards are under development and called “LTE Advanced” and
“WirelessMAN-Advanced” respectively. ITU has decided that “LTE Advanced”
and “WirelessMAN-Advanced” should be accorded the official designation
of IMT-Advanced. On December 6, 2010, ITU announced that current
versions of LTE, WiMax and other evolved 3G technologies that do not
fulfill "IMT-Advanced" requirements could be considered "4G", provided
they represent forerunners to IMT-Advanced and "a substantial level of
improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial
third generation systems now deployed." In other words, the standards
body has approved the marketing hype — well at least partial hype.
In
all suggestions for 4G, the CDMA spread spectrum radio technology used
in 3G systems and IS-95 is abandoned and replaced by OFDMA and other
frequency-domain equalization schemes. This is combined with MIMO
(Multiple In, Multiple Out), for example, multiple antennas, dynamic
channel allocation and channel-dependent scheduling. (If the last
paragraph made any sense to you at all, then I assume you have a
subscription to Radio-Electronics magazine, a soldering iron on your
desk, and a plastic pocket protector — I know I do!)
It is
against this technical background that Verizon, the largest cell phone
carrier in the US, has announced their LTE network. It is the fastest in
the land, and, once again, makes Verizon the premiere cell phone
carrier in the US. Verizon is actually the fourth US carrier to call its
network 4G, after T-Mobile, Sprint, and MetroPCS. With LTE, Verizon
chose a truly forward-looking 4G technology. AT&T, Cricket, and
MetroPCS have all committed to going to LTE, and it is shaping out as
the dominant technology for advanced cell phone data networks. However,
the four carriers use very different technologies, none of which are
technically 4G. Sprint has a WiMAX network, T-Mobile's network is HSPA+
and MetroPCS's is LTE, but a much slower variant than Verizon is using.
Verizon's
LTE network currently covers 38 major metro areas and more than 60
airports, about a third of the U.S. population. The carrier has said it
will have complete nationwide coverage by 2013.
Sprint has
more metro areas covered — in the sixties — but covers less of some of
them. While the two carriers' coverage areas around Chicago are
equivalent, for example, Verizon covers more suburban counties in the
New York City area. T-Mobile is the 4G coverage leader, covering 96
percent of the U.S. population with its HSPA+ 21 technology. (That’s
some justification for the pretty girl in the poka-dot dress.)
To
me, more importantly, Verizon has a stronger reputation for providing
even coverage within cities. Although I think Verizon has a misleading
online coverage map — it doesn't show signal strength, they are a
definite coverage leader — well ahead of AT&T. While Sprint's WiMAX
system tends to be spotty and variable, more consistent results have
been reported than from Verizon's network.
Verizon
promises 5-12Mbps down and 2-5Mbps up. Considering the carrier's 3G EVDO
system offers 1Mbps down on average, that's a huge improvement. It's
faster than some home connections.
LTE had no problem with
even the most demanding Internet applications. Skype audio and video
calls are clear. YouTube videos play in 720p HD without a problem.
Netflix and Hulu Plus stream easily. Download a 350MB file through
BitTorrent in about ten minutes. There may be some problems with
multiplayer gaming; you may have a slight problem with lag. Although
LTE's average ping of 67ms was much faster than WiMax and HSPA+ (which
were at 100-120ms), wired connections are typically around 30ms. (With
this data, lower numbers are better.)
Verizon LTE was
launched in December, and Verizon promises that, in subsequent years, an
aggressive growth plan will result in full nationwide coverage in 2013.
The company’s 4G LTE network ultimately will connect a full range of
electronics devices and machines to each other. Let’s hope that they can
follow through on that promise. For those planning to purchase the
iPhone on the Verizon network and those waiting for the 4G iPhone to be
available on this new carrier, I wish you luck.
I wish you luck
I hope you get what you deserve
I wish you luck
I hope you catch before the curve
I wish you luck
I hope you make it to the end
I wish you luck
Originally written on February 1, 2011.
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment